I just finished the book by Francis Chan called Erasing Hell. Here's some of the highlights from my reading:
- If you were on a deserted island and you uncorked an empty bottle containing Philippians 2:9-11, you would probably be a universalist.
- The wrath of Jesus here is retributive and not corrective.
- The “all” who will be “made alive” in Christ refers to believers of all types, not every single person.
- No passage in the Bible says that there will be a second chance after death to turn to Jesus.
- The typical afterlife scenario among Jews in Jesus’ day was that after the wicked die, they go to a place called hades, sometimes called sheol. It is a place where the wicked wait until judgment day.
- Some Jewish writers believed that the wicked would be annihilated. Others believed it was a place of unending torment.
- In the Old Testament, the Hinnom Valley was the place where some Israelites engaged in idolatrous worship of the Canaanite gods Molech and Baal. For first century Jews, the violent image of evildoers being punished in the Hinnom Valley provided a fitting analogy for God punishing the wicked in hell.
- If Jesus rejected the widespread Jewish belief in hell, then He would certainly need to be clear about this.
- For Jesus, hell is a place of punishment after judgement, it is described in imagery of fire and darkness, and is a place of annihilation or never ending punishment.
- The hell that Jesus described here is not a hell-on-earth that accompanies our bad decisions during this life, and it certainly isn’t the never-ending party that AC/DC describes in their song.
In summary, the book was the counterpoint to Rob Bell's Love Wins, showing on the one hand how some could come to a certain view of hell, but on the other hand, here's how it really is.